On 12/31/14 7:14 PM, Walter Bright wrote: > On 12/31/2014 1:23 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >>> And it's no wonder why there are so many alternatives (rake, nake, etc.) >> ... Neither of which successful :o) > > I googled nake and couldn't find any references to it. Oh, it's for Nimrod (Now Nim)