Improving ddoc

[ketmar via Digitalmars-d]

On Wed, 31 Dec 2014 22:58:46 +0000
Freddy via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, 31 December 2014 at 21:51:32 UTC, ketmar via 
> Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Dec 2014 11:50:51 -0800
> > Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d 
> > <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> In wake of the recent discussions on improving ddoc syntax 
> >> we're looking at doing something about it. Please discuss any 
> >> ideas you might have here. Thanks!
> >
> > ahem... kill it and use markdown instead.
> 
> http://commonmark.org/

ah, "markdown" here means "anything human-readable", be it markdown,
textile, restructured, or something completely different. i don't
really care, as long as it's not littered by visual noise.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20150101/04f29b64/attachment.sig>