Smart pointers instead of GC?

[Adam D. Ruppe]

On Sunday, 2 February 2014 at 10:53:36 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> What do you think about my `scope` proposal? It does not 
> introduce any new syntax and should be somewhat in line with 
> existing reference escape analysis.

What's the link to your proposal? I think I've read it before and 
liked it (scope would rock) but not sure it is the same thing on 
my mind.