Smart pointers instead of GC?
Adam D. Ruppe
destructionator at gmail.com
Sun Feb 2 06:12:38 PST 2014
On Sunday, 2 February 2014 at 10:53:36 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> What do you think about my `scope` proposal? It does not
> introduce any new syntax and should be somewhat in line with
> existing reference escape analysis.
What's the link to your proposal? I think I've read it before and
liked it (scope would rock) but not sure it is the same thing on
my mind.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list