Smart pointers instead of GC?

[Walter Bright]

On 2/3/2014 3:45 AM, Michel Fortin wrote:
> As for writing functions twice, I don't see it. T is implicitly convertible to
> T?, so a single function with a T? parameter will work with both T and T?
> arguments.

It's the same issue as with const (which we dealt with by adding the 'inout' 
qualifier). It's the affect of the argument type on the return type.