Smart pointers instead of GC?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 2/3/14, 2:51 PM, Frank Bauer wrote:
> I'm not quite sure that I understand what you mean by GC avoidance being
> a major focus of 2014 though. In the long term, can I look forward to
> writing an absolutely, like in 100 %, like in guaranteed, GC free D app
> with all of current D's and Phobos' features if I choose to? Or does it
> mean: well for the most part it will avoid the GC, but if you're unlucky
> the GC might still kick in if you don't pay attention and when you least
> expect it?

Depends on how we (including YOU) design it.

Andrei