Phobos for Review: std.buffer.scopebuffer

[Walter Bright]

On 2/10/2014 11:46 AM, Dicebot wrote:
> I personally will vote "No" for any new proposal that looks obviously alien from
> existing Phobos code, despite it being possibly very useful and desired and
> backed by sound reasoning.

1. There are many, many package folders in phobos/druntime that do not have a 
package.d.

2. package.d can always be added. But it cannot be subtracted. Hence, it is best 
not to add it "just because", it needs more compelling arguments.