D as A Better C?

[Paulo Pinto]

Am 11.02.2014 23:01, schrieb bearophile:
> ed:
>
>> The D compiler catches subtle bugs that creep into C code when
>> deadlines are tight and the porting itself is great as a review process.
>
> Isn't using something Clang (plus eventually a static analyzer) an even
> better strategy?
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

I also would consider it a better approach.

Even me with my C bashing, think that

clang + warnings as errors + static analyzer == C with Pascal like safety

--
Paulo