D as A Better C?

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 11/02/14 22:12, Frank Bauer wrote:
> Excellent idea. All the cries (including mine) for a non-GC D
> would stop at once.

I hope so, but I doubt it.  Instead the criticisms will start focusing on the 
lack of library functionality and the potential for a Phobos/Tango style split 
between regular D and the minimal non-GC D.

That's not however a reason to not go forward with this.