switch()
Kapps
opantm2+spam at gmail.com
Mon Feb 17 00:06:11 PST 2014
On Sunday, 16 February 2014 at 15:43:31 UTC, Manu wrote:
>
> int difficulty;
> switch(e.note.note)
> {
> case 60: .. case 71:
> difficulty = 0;
> break;
> case 72: .. case 83:
> difficulty = 1;
> break;
> case 84: .. case 95:
> difficulty = 2;
> break;
> case 96: .. case 107:
> difficulty = 3;
> break;
> default:
> difficulty = -1;
> break;
> }
I do agree that the breaks can get rather messy and I don't think
that the current syntax is perfect. However I also find that in
most situations where a switch statement is useful, it's not a
bad idea to have it as a separate method anyways. In this case:
int getDifficulty(int note) {
switch(note) {
case 60: .. case 71:
return 0;
case 72: .. case 83:
return 1;
case 84: .. case 95:
return 2;
case 96: .. case 107:
return 3;
default:
return -1;
}
}
Since it's using a return there's no break required and it's
arguably a cleaner separation.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list