Formal review of std.lexer

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2014-02-26 16:18, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

> I think we wouldn't want to add one more package for each language
> supported.

That's exactly what we want, preferably in a common package:

std.language.d.lexer
std.language.d.ast
std.language.d.parser

std.language.xml.lexer
std.language.xml.parser
std.language.xml.dom

What do you suggest, having multiple lexers for different languages in 
the same module?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg