Graphics Library for D

[finalpatch]

On Wednesday, 8 January 2014 at 23:29:59 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
> Even with a full port of 2.4 to D it would still fall under the 
> BSD 3-Clause license which is not Boost compliant IIRC. So it 
> will never end up in Phobos. If I am missing something let me 
> know, because a Phobos Software Renderer is a good idea.

Hi Adam,

We don't necessarily have to port AGG to D. Instead, I suggest we 
produce something that resembles its design (a set of very 
flexible components that can be put together through template 
instantiation at compile time), but in idiomatic D.  With the 
power of D, the group wisdom of the community, and the lessons 
learned from AGG and other prior projects, it's very possible we 
can produce something even more impressive than AGG. Since it's a 
pure software renderer, the scope of the project will be a lot 
more manageable than GPU based solutions.