immutable bug?
Adam D. Ruppe
destructionator at gmail.com
Sat Jan 11 10:52:38 PST 2014
On Saturday, 11 January 2014 at 18:48:15 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
> It is legal exactly because function is marked as pure. Result
> of pure function is implicitly convertible to immutable.
It shouldn't be here though... the reason it is implicitly
convertable is that pure means the result is unique. But, with
the hidden this pointer having a reference to the data as well,
it obviously is not unique. I think the compiler should catch
this; i'd call it a bug.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list