AA literals/initialisation
Daniel Murphy
yebbliesnospam at gmail.com
Sun Jan 12 06:30:40 PST 2014
"Jakob Ovrum" wrote in message news:whwxxduozvqjrcldmggt at forum.dlang.org...
> Alright, that looks more short-term viable than Stepanov's approach. I
> don't think I'm overplaying the issue though - it is a tall order to ask
> for compile-time construction of AAs that are then usable at runtime, and
> it's not fair to present them as a fundamental feature, or their absence
> as a bug, because it's not like other languages have anything near this
> kind of power.
This used to be true, but now we can pass heap-allocated structs and classes
from compile-time to run-time. The fact we can't do the same for AAs is an
embarrassing limitation.
It would have happened years ago if AAs weren't such a mess.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list