foreach thoughts

[Dominikus Dittes Scherkl]

On Tuesday, 14 January 2014 at 15:02:19 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 14 January 2014 at 14:38:18 UTC, Meta wrote:
>> I'm not sure if you're genuinely misunderstanding him or 
>> trying as hard as possible to intentionally misrepresent his 
>> point.
>
> I don't think unary/binary is a good enough distinction when 
> the semantics are orthogonal.

I think it is. It would be far worse if the semantics were 
related.