critique of vibe.d

[Puming via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 01:13:39 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8 July 2014 at 20:39:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
> wrote:
>> There's been some discussion about vibe.d recently on reddit 
>> (e.g. 
>> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2a20h5/wired_magazine_discovers_d/cir9443) 
>> and I was wondering to what extent that's meaningful:
>>
>> "has anyone ever tied a real webservice to vibe.d? I actually 
>> tried. its nowhere near complete in any sense. you simply 
>> cannot compare it with go's standard http lib, sorry, I tried."
>>
>> If there's sheer work needed for completing vibe.d, I think it 
>> would be great if the domain-savvy part of the community would 
>> rally around it. Serving dlang.org and dconf.org off of vibe.d 
>> would be awesome dogfooding.
>>
>>
>
> I use vibe.d and I have no idea what that commenter was on 
> about.
That commenter is probably a web developer that wants all 
batteries included.
>
>> Andrei