Review: std.logger

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 2014-07-13 13:57, Robert burner Schadek wrote:

> Anyone else?

I agree with Sönke.

> if I change it back, people will argue that that is redundant and
> unintuitive. Than I will change it back again and the discussion starts
> again.

"logError" is a lot more clear and descriptive. I think that's 
important. If people don't like that they can use an alias.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg