Review: std.logger

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 17:02:59 UTC, Jeremy Powers via 
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> The stated goal of this log library is to provide a base with 
> common useful
> functionality, in a way that can be extended to fit more 
> complicated use
> cases.  I'd argue that what you are talking about fits into the 
> 'more
> complicated' - the log API should definitely allow this, in a 
> way that it
> can be plugged in without log using code having to change, but 
> I don't
> believe the functionality needs to be in the base library (at 
> this time).

Getting things changed is more difficult than getting it right 
from the start. As far as I am concerned it is crucial in the 
sense that if it does not support severity levels and easy 
integration with existing logging services then I probably won't 
use it.