GCs in the news

[Araq via Digitalmars-d]

> I feel it is a major concern, if I'm starting a project with 
> low latency requirements* I certainly think twice about using 
> D. I think this could apply especially to people outside the 
> community who might not have experienced the benefits D 
> provides. The issue is not there is a GC, it's that the GC is 
> viewed as bad. If the GC was as good as Azul's C4 GC then D 
> would be perfect. I'm not sure if D's memory model supports 
> such a collector though.

It doesn't.