GCs in the news

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 18:08:18 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 17:58:15 UTC, Chris wrote:
>> That's good news! See, we're getting there, just bear with us. 
>> This begs the question of course, how will this affect 
>> existing code? My code is string intensive.
>
> Usually GC-free API is added by providing new overloads that 
> take an output range instance as an argument so no existing 
> code should break (it will still use allocating versions)

Yes, output ranges are underused by now.