Naming of new lazy versions of existing Phobos functions

[Brad Anderson via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 18:49:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh via 
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> [...]
> I think it's a fool's errand to try to invent a single system 
> of naming
> that's blindly applied across the board. We should have some 
> guiding
> principles for common cases (like "withXxx", "xxxOf", "verbed", 
> etc.)
> for the sake of overall consistency, but we should consider 
> each name on
> a case-to-case basis and make appropriate exceptions where it 
> makes more
> sense ("tildeExpanded" sounds much better than 
> "withExpandTilde" or
> "expandTildeOf" or "expandedTilde", for example).
>
>
> T

I think the alternatives you gave show that you are right about 
this. Everything should be done on a case-by-case basis with the 
schemes mentioned being just some ideas you could choose from to 
help find a good name.