Naming of new lazy versions of existing Phobos functions

[Tobias Pankrath via Digitalmars-d]

> Do we really want to be naming functions which aren't 
> properties with adjectives instead of verbs? That seems very 
> wrong to me. I'd much rather see stuff like setExt or 
> setExtLazy than withExtension or extensionSet. Function names 
> are supposed to be verbs unless they're emulating variables. 
> They _do_ something, even if it's lazy.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

I think it is appropiate to use adjectives for lazy functions. 
The "Use verbs for functions"-rule holds no ground in lazy 
evaluation, except you want to call them "wrapInExtensionSetter" 
or something like that.