Naming of new lazy versions of existing Phobos functions

[Yota via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 18 July 2014 at 20:35:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 7/18/2014 12:40 PM, Tourist wrote:
>> Are you planning to deprecate the non-lazy functions at some 
>> (maybe very
>> distant) point?
>
> No. Phobos has already gone through multiple rounds of 
> renaming/deprecation, all at considerable disruption. Each one 
> was supposed to be "worth it" and the "last time". It needs to 
> stop.

Is an alternate module an option?  std.string.lazy, etc.