Review: std.logger

[linkrope via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 22 July 2014 at 07:27:38 UTC, ponce wrote:
> On Sunday, 20 July 2014 at 16:15:53 UTC, linkrope wrote:
>> By the way: Instead of what I really need, I get a NullLogger.
>> I have no clue, why I never ever missed such an oddity.
>
> I asked for it. And I use it, because I write libraries that 
> log warnings but don't forcefully require the users to provide 
> a Logger if they don't want to.
> And that way, I can still write "logger.warningf" without "if" 
> everywhere.

But then it's better to provide no logger (or at least no logger 
for level warning) than an artificial NullLogger.