checkedint call removal
John Colvin via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Jul 28 08:52:21 PDT 2014
On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 15:20:44 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
> If asserts were used as optimization constraints
all available code is fair game as optimisation constraints. What
you are asking for is a special case for `assert` such that the
optimiser is blind to it.
bool foo(int a)
{
//let's handwrite a simple assert
if(a >= 0)
{
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
//and then do something.
return a < 0;
}
Of course the compiler is free to rewrite that as
bool foo(int a)
{
if(a >= 0)
{
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
return true;
}
Why should the situation be different if I use the builtin
`assert` instead?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list