[ABI] 128bit integers and other vendor types
Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Jul 28 12:13:03 PDT 2014
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:lr64ah$1akc$1 at digitalmars.com...
> Agreed. Conversely we'd be hamstringing ourselves by essentially making D
> a poorer choice for implementing dmd than any other languages.
This doesn't make any sense. Somehow D is a worse choice than C++ if we
don't use phobos?
> I'm not among the compiler development regulars but it seems to me
> converting to ddmd would be a mistake if we don't plan for using Phobos.
You are severely underestimating the benefits of D as a language.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list