Voting: std.logger

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

(sorry for being a bit late, was distracted)

std.logger proposal by Robert Schadek enters voting period which 
will last two weeks starting from now.

Discussion thread : 
http://forum.dlang.org/post/zhvmkbahrqtgkptdlcvh@forum.dlang.org

This voting will be somewhat different from previous ones because 
it will be done with std.experimental in mind. Because of that 
please reply with a bit more structured votes:

1) Yes / No for inclusion into std.experimental

At this point please consider if module has functionality you 
want to see in standard library in general and if implementation 
is not fundamentally broken. This is a simple sanity check.

2) Yes / No for inclusion into Phobos in its current state

This is where you should summarize your concerns raised during 
review if there are any and make decision if existing API / 
architecture are promising enough to be set in stone via Phobos 
inclusion.

3) If you have answered "No" for (2) :  list of mandatory changes 
that are needed to make you vote "Yes"

4) Any additional comments for author.

Please separate (3) from (4) in some obvious fashion to make it 
possible for author to prioritize of feedback. Please use linked 
thread for discussions and only post vote + summary here.

Currently only answer for (1) affects the voting outcome. Other 
answers are necessary to eventually  prepare std.logger for 
second voting during beta period of some future release (for 
actual inclusion into Phobos).

If you have any comments / proposals about actual voting 
procedure or review process please create separate thread.

Go ahead ;)