Voting: std.logger

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 06:09:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> No in current form. Yes assuming the fixes below are 
> implemented.

> ...

> No. I also think any new module should sit in std.experimental 
> for one release cycle.

Clarification, just to be sure you got it right - right now we 
_only_ vote on inclusion into std.experimental, even if majority 
of voters will consider it Phobos-quality. Staging period of one 
release cycle is mandatory.

That said - can you explain a bit more why you think it can't be 
included in std.experimental? (== think that it is fundamentally 
broken to the point it can't be even suggested for experiments) 
Most issues listed seem to be more related to actual Phobos 
inclusion.