Voting: std.logger

[John Colvin via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 05:11:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>
> 1) Yes / No for inclusion into std.experimental

Yes. It's ready for an official stamp.

> 2) Yes / No for inclusion into Phobos in its current state

No. Full advantage should be taken of the std.experimental time.

> 3) If you have answered "No" for (2) :  list of mandatory 
> changes that are needed to make you vote "Yes"

Nothing new here, it's been covered by others. If I had to pick 
out something: Using overloads properly is a clear improvement 
step that must be taken for this to be considered phobos quality.