Voting: std.logger

Francesco Cattoglio via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jul 29 05:25:20 PDT 2014


On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 05:11:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> 1) Yes / No for inclusion into std.experimental
Yes, absolutely.

> 2) Yes / No for inclusion into Phobos in its current state
Not yet.

> 3) If you have answered "No" for (2) :  list of mandatory 
> changes that
> are needed to make you vote "Yes"
As far as I undestood, there's no way right now to do logging 
without using the GC. And that means it is currently impossible 
to log inside destructor calls. That is a blocker in my book.

> 4) Any additional comments for author.
No matter the changes that might be applied to reduce suffix 
notation, I would love to retain the ability to do conditional 
unformatted logging.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list