Voting: std.logger
Francesco Cattoglio via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jul 29 05:25:20 PDT 2014
On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 05:11:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> 1) Yes / No for inclusion into std.experimental
Yes, absolutely.
> 2) Yes / No for inclusion into Phobos in its current state
Not yet.
> 3) If you have answered "No" for (2) : list of mandatory
> changes that
> are needed to make you vote "Yes"
As far as I undestood, there's no way right now to do logging
without using the GC. And that means it is currently impossible
to log inside destructor calls. That is a blocker in my book.
> 4) Any additional comments for author.
No matter the changes that might be applied to reduce suffix
notation, I would love to retain the ability to do conditional
unformatted logging.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list