discuss disqus

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 30 July 2014 at 13:10:35 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
> Serious question: what exactly is "supplemental documentation"?
>  In my view, if it's good enough to be considered 
> documentation, it belongs in the documentation.  Anything else 
> is just pussy-footing around.

For example articles that explain a concept in more detail than 
is suitable for the documentation, things like 
http://dlang.org/d-array-article.html for instance. But I think 
these are better placed into the wiki, and linked from the 
documentation.