Case for std.experimental

[Mike James via Digitalmars-d]

"Andrei Alexandrescu" <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote in message 
news:lr8r7a$j7v$1 at digitalmars.com...
> On 7/29/14, 12:01 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>> Frankly, if Dub is bundled with D, I don't see any reason for
>> std.experimental to exist.  Those two ideas just seemed to
>> develop in parallel.
>
> The way I see it:
>
> * dub: a loose federation of libraries with no implied promise.
>
> * std.experimental: 99% sure to make it in std, use at your risk but 
> there's a high likelihood you'll just remove ".experimental" next release, 
> fix whatever doesn't compile, and you're good to go.
>
>
> Andrei

+1

-=mike=-