checkedint call removal

[Tofu Ninja via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 31 July 2014 at 20:57:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 7/31/14, 12:37 PM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
>>
>> This thread however shows that many D users (who probably have 
>> more D
>> experience than myself) are not aware that assert() may 
>> influence
>> optimization and would prefer to have separate syntax to tell 
>> the
>> optimizer what values he can expect.
>
> Yah, I think that's a good outcome. We must document assert 
> better. -- Andrei

Its a little too late for that I think, asserts are already being 
used so to change the meaning now is wrong. Earlier I said that 
maybe a documentation change is all that is needed but I retract 
that statement.