What's going on with std.experimental.lexer?

[David Gileadi via Digitalmars-d]

On 6/10/14, 3:57 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> I agree all the way with std.experimental as the package name.  Though
> I might throw in an alternative argument to stdx and instead promote
> unsafe.* or std.unsafe.  ;-)

The only issue I see with *.unsafe.* is that it sounds related to 
@safety. So far I haven't seen a better name than std.experimental.