DIP63 : operator overloading for raw templates

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 17 June 2014 at 00:36:43 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> To be more constructive, naming something by its use will 
> fatally look very weird and confusing when other uses are 
> found. And here we see that it is not even implemented but 
> already have other uses. Can we please avoid that pitfall ?

It is not named by its use. I have never meant that. Template 
argument list is what that thing _is_, by definition and compiler 
implementation. We simply don't have any other construct in the 
language to refer to with no semantic confusion.