DIP64: Attribute Cleanup
Peter Alexander via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Jun 21 10:11:22 PDT 2014
On Friday, 20 June 2014 at 19:22:04 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP64
All things being equal, it would be nicer to have consistency,
but do we really I want to break almost all existing code?
I know you've proposed a tool to do the transition, but there are
lots of unmaintained projects out there that are still used, and
tutorials/articles/books/university courses written using the
existing syntax. Those likely won't be, or can't be changed
easily.
One possible compromise might be to leave the old syntax there
for legacy reasons, but allow (and encourage) @pure, @nothrow,
etc.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list