DIP64: Attribute Cleanup
francesco cattoglio via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Jun 21 11:19:07 PDT 2014
On Saturday, 21 June 2014 at 18:07:25 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
> And it's C++ that shows that almost all of D attributes are not
> necessary.
How so?
Anyway, I totally agree that attributes NEED cleanup, it really
makes zero sense to have some without "@" annotation. Really,
keep Scott's talk in mind! :P
About code breakage: a sane deprecation path and an automated
tool to make the code up-to-date will make sure there is zero
discomfort for D users.
The alias for the @attribute set seems a very nice syntax to me.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list