DIP64: Attribute Cleanup
Shammah Chancellor via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Jun 22 05:18:04 PDT 2014
On 2014-06-21 19:33:44 +0000, Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d said:
> On 06/21/14 19:56, Shammah Chancellor via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> I like it, but I think the attribute sets should be based on then alias
>> syntax though.
>>
>> alias @attributeSet = (@attribute1, @attribute2, @attribute3);
>
> Well, D does not have that kind of tuple syntax and introducing one for
> this special case wouldn't be a good idea. Other than that, this feature
> already exists, only it's currently limited to user defined attributes.
> The present syntax looks like this:
>
> alias Tuple(A...) = A;
> alias attributeSet = Tuple!(attribute1, attribute2, attribute3);
>
> and is already usable with UDAs and "magic" attributes:
>
> version (GNU) {
> static import gcc.attribute;
> enum noinline = gcc.attribute.attribute("noinline");
> }
>
> struct other_attribute {}
>
> alias Tuple(A...) = A;
>
> alias spiffy = Tuple!(other_attribute, noinline);
>
> @spiffy int f(int a) { return a+a; }
>
> I'm not sure inventing another syntax is necessary.
>
> (Making the built-in (keyword) attributes less special is of course
> the hard part, but the choice of syntax shouldn't really affect that)
>
> artur
So, basically we don't need special syntax for attribute sets, we just
need to make it so built-in attributes are not "special?"
-Shammah
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list