Philosophy of how OS API imports are laid out in druntime
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Fri Mar 7 01:34:33 PST 2014
On 3/7/2014 1:03 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 7 March 2014 08:34, Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
>> On 3/7/2014 12:00 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>>
>>> I assume the C headers will remain strictly under core.stdc? So it
>>> might make sense to transition core.sys -> core.stdc.sys?
>>
>>
>> I think core.stdc for the Standard C headers can remain the same.
>>
>
> OK - now that has been sorted. What's your opinion on where ports of
> standard C and system C headers should go?
>
Standard C => core.stdc
Operating system API = > core? core.sys? core.os? I don't have strong feelings
about that.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list