Major performance problem with std.array.front()
Kagamin
spam at here.lot
Fri Mar 7 02:44:45 PST 2014
On Friday, 7 March 2014 at 04:01:15 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> BTW you know what would help this? A pragma we can attach to a
> struct which makes it a very thin value type.
>
> pragma(thin_struct)
> struct A {
> int a;
> int foo() { return a; }
> static A get() { A(10); }
> }
>
> void test() {
> A a = A.get();
> printf("%d", a.foo());
> }
>
> With the pragma, A would be completely indistinguishable from
> int in all ways.
>
> What do I mean?
> $ dmd -release -O -inline test56 -c
>
> Let's look at A.foo:
>
> A.foo:
> 0: 55 push ebp
> 1: 8b ec mov ebp,esp
> 3: 50 push eax
> 4: 8b 00 mov eax,DWORD PTR [eax] ;
> waste!
> 6: 8b e5 mov esp,ebp
> 8: 5d pop ebp
> 9: c3 ret
>
>
> It is line four that bugs me: the struct is passed as a
> *pointer*, but its only contents are an int, which could just
> as well be passed as a value. Let's compare it to an identical
> function in operation:
>
> int identity(int a) { return a; }
>
> 00000000 <_D6test568identityFiZi>:
> 0: 55 push ebp
> 1: 8b ec mov ebp,esp
> 3: 83 ec 04 sub esp,0x4
> 6: c9 leave
> 7: c3 ret
>
> lol it *still* wastes time, setting up a stack frame for
> nothing. But we could just as well write asm { naked; ret; }
> and it would work as expected: the argument is passed in EAX
> and the return value is expected in EAX. The function doesn't
> actually have to do anything.
struct A {
int a;
//int foo() { return a; }
static A get() { A(10); }
}
int foo(A a) { return a.a; }
printf("%d", a.foo());
Now it's passed by value.
Though, I needed checked arithmetic only twice: for cast from
long to int and for cast from double to long. If you expect your
number type to overflow, you probably chose wrong type.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list