"Maybe in D3..."

[John Colvin]

On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 15:16:13 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 14:50:27 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
> wrote:
>> From time to time, there are discussions concerning ideas 
>> which would impact the language, as it is now, too drastically 
>> to be implemented (it would break too much code or require a 
>> significant reengineering effort). These discussions get lost, 
>> which is regrettable since some of the discussions sometimes 
>> produce genuinely great ideas.
>>
>> Although there is no D3 on the horizon, I think it would be 
>> nice to keep track of these ideas anyway.
>>
>> http://wiki.dlang.org/Language_issues
>
> I remember someone already creating such page but can't 
> remember the title :(
> Main problem with it is that with D3 not being a realistic 
> option there is not much motivation into maintaining it. Some 
> ideas are great but by time those may become demanded 
> collective conscious is likely to produce even greater ideas :)

Keeping track of the ideas is still worthwhile though, if only to 
bring people up to speed who haven't been part of the whole 
conversation.