Major performance problem with std.array.front()

Yota yotaxp at thatGoogleMailThing.com
Mon Mar 10 16:35:07 PDT 2014


On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 14:42:18 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Yes. I have given up about this idea at some point as there 
> seemed to be consensus that no breaking changes will be even 
> considered for D2 and those that come from fixing bugs are not 
> worth the fuss.

So at what point are we going to discuss these things
in the context of D-next?  These topics have us group
up and focus on compromises instead of ideals.  As was
said, D2 is at the 90% point.  It only has room left
for bug fixes.  I think we would make much more
productive use of our time and minds coming up with
ideas that actually have a chance of coming to
fruition, even if D3 ends up being half a decade away.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list