Broken?

[Brad Anderson]

On Tuesday, 11 March 2014 at 18:35:57 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 March 2014 at 18:29:35 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 11 March 2014 at 18:14:52 UTC, Steven 
>> Schveighoffer wrote:
>>> On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 13:47:55 -0400, Steve Teale
>>
>> Functions final by default? I read the list of changes for 
>> 2.065, and that one got by me completely.
>>
>> Aargh!
>
> Not in 2.065
> 2.066  will introduce "virtual" keyword
> 2.067+ will change the defaults if it will still be considered 
> good idea

Have a link to where that was decided? I was under the impression 
that virtual was  accepted as a compromise so people could just 
stick "final:" at the top of their classes have have something 
acceptably close to final-by-default. I can't remember if I 
actually managed to keep up with that behemoth of a thread though.