Broken?

[Dicebot]

On Tuesday, 11 March 2014 at 21:35:12 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 11 March 2014 at 21:29:00 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>    final: // want all to be final by default
>>
>>    // ...
>>
>>    virtual void foo() {} // but this one function
>
> Doesn't this make room for undetected bugs?
>
> Generally the syntax should have enough redundancy to prevent a 
> single typo (missing ":") from completely changing the 
> semantics.
>
> Ola.

Mostly depends on the way you format the code. It is perfectly 
consistent with existing @safe / @system interaction though and 
allows to define defaults in user code without changing anything 
in the language ;)