Final by default?
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Thu Mar 13 16:43:28 PDT 2014
On 3/13/2014 4:10 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
> To be pedantic, there was a TC released in 2003. And many of the
> C++11 features were available years ahead of time from all the
> usual library sources. But I agree that the ISO process isn't
> fast. In fact, I think that's an actual goal, as the industries
> that depend on these standards are slow-moving as well.
Of course. Slow is not always a bad thing.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list