Final by default?
Daniel Murphy
yebbliesnospam at gmail.com
Thu Mar 13 20:40:21 PDT 2014
"Walter Bright" wrote in message news:lft8ok$2epl$1 at digitalmars.com...
> Also,
>
> class C { final: ... }
>
> achieves final-by-default and it breaks nothing.
No, it doesn't, because it is not usable if C introduces any virtual
methods.
On the other hand,
class C { virtual: ... }
_does_ trivially bring back virtual-by-default.
The idea that over the course of (at least) a year, having to add this to
some of your classes (that the compiler identifies) is large and
unacceptable breakage is just nonsense.
Eg In dmd's OO-heavy code, ~13% of the classes introduce a virtual method.
In those 44 classes, every single non-virtual method needs to be marked as
final (~700 methods)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list