Final by default?

[monarch_dodra]

On Saturday, 15 March 2014 at 07:36:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 3/14/2014 9:02 PM, Manu wrote:
>> That said, function inlining is perhaps the single most 
>> important API level
>> performance detail, and especially true in OO code (which 
>> advocates
>> accessors/properties).
>
> I find it peculiar to desire a 'final accessor'. After all,
>
>     class C {
>         int x;
>         final int getX() { return x; } <= what the heck is this 
> function for?
>     }
>
> The only reason to have an accessor function is so it can be 
> virtual.

Um... Read only attributes? Forgot the discussions about 
@property ?

This makes sense to me:
class C
{
     private int _x;

     ///Gets x
     final int x() @property { return x; }
}