Assault & battery on pull requests
Jakob Ovrum
jakobovrum at gmail.com
Sun Mar 16 15:32:12 PDT 2014
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 21:46:09 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
> I have accumulated a bunch of insight in short term memory,
> among which (1) people are happy to work on a variety of things
> if given just a little vision and guidance; (2) it is more
> difficult yet more productive in the long run to shepherd a
> weak submission with good parts to completion, than to dismiss
> it for its defects; (3) being able to drain the request
> pipeline effectively is key to D's success.
I've always thought #2 is especially important when the submitter
is a beginner to either D, dmd/druntime/Phobos or the review
process; we should aim to foster a culture where the barrier to
entry is as low as possible. It's always nice to see more
returning submitters.
> After my review binge, Phobos open pull requests are 44, a
> historical low. Please hop on and let's drain that pipe
> entirely!
Thanks for the reviews. It would be really awesome if we could
get the queue under control. I feel we are heading there.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list