Formal review of std.buffer.scopebuffer
Jacob Carlborg
doob at me.com
Mon Mar 17 12:28:37 PDT 2014
On 2014-03-17 20:07, Walter Bright wrote:
> ScopeBuffer has been there and commented on for about 2 months now.
That's because you created a pull request instead of asking for a formal
review. A pull request should NOT be created until a module is accepted
after a review and voting.
You're sneaking in a new module although it has not gone through a
formal review. This is not how new modules should be added.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list