Final by default?

[deadalnix]

On Tuesday, 18 March 2014 at 01:25:34 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> While I personally would have been perfectly ok with changing 
> to final-by-default (I'm fine either way), I can't help 
> wondering: Is it really that big of a deal to sprinkle some 
> "final"s into the occasional third party library if you really 
> need to?

It makes that much noise because this is a problem that everybody 
understand. Much bigger problem do not receive any attention.