Most basic nothrow, pure, @safe functions?

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 19:48:45 -0400, Walter Bright  
<newshound2 at digitalmars.com> wrote:

> On 3/18/2014 4:20 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> In a recent (well, recently pulled anyway) pull request that Monarch  
>> Dodra
>> brought up, we debated what should be considered nothrow in the depths  
>> of druntime.
>
> There's a lot of low hanging nothrow fruit in druntime that doesn't need  
> analysis, it just needs to get done:
>
> https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12389

Can we mark _d_monitorenter and _d_monitorexit nothrow and have the  
compiler see that when using synchronized? This was the hurdle we couldn't  
overcome in the referenced pull request.

Should those be marked nothrow? What about pure and @safe?

-Steve